Pakistan’s merchandise trade deficit with seven Gulf and Middle Eastern trading partners narrowed by 26.35% to approximately $2.85 billion in July-September 2026, the first quarter of fiscal year 2026-27, according to State Bank of Pakistan data reported by Dawn on October 25. The comparable shortfall one year earlier was approximately $3.87 billion. Lower imports accounted for most of the change, alongside a more modest rise in exports.
The regional figures show exports of $864.878 million, up 10.96% from $779.425 million in the year-earlier quarter. Imports declined 20.02% to $3.717 billion from $4.648 billion. These totals indicate a narrower bilateral and regional trading gap, but they do not mean that Pakistan’s overall national merchandise trade deficit has narrowed. Separate Pakistan Bureau of Statistics releases show that nationwide imports still exceeded exports by a substantial amount, and the national deficit increased year on year during the quarter.
The distinction is crucial for businesses, investors and readers: a smaller deficit with selected trading partners can reflect reduced energy purchases and disrupted trade flows, not necessarily an economy-wide improvement in production or export competitiveness.
Pakistan’s Gulf Trade Deficit: Key Figures
The regional trade numbers refer to Pakistan’s trade with the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain and Jordan. Jordan is geographically outside the Gulf Cooperation Council, so the phrase ‘Gulf partners’ is a convenient description of the seven-country grouping used in the reporting rather than a claim that all seven are GCC members.
For July–September FY27, the reported export total of $864.878 million was $85.453 million higher than the $779.425 million recorded a year earlier. Meanwhile, imports dropped by about $931 million, from $4.648 billion to $3.717 billion. Subtracting exports from imports produces a deficit of approximately $2.852 billion, which rounds to the reported $2.85 billion. The base-period numbers similarly produce roughly $3.869 billion, rounded to $3.87 billion.
The fall in the deficit, about $1.02 billion in rounded terms, is dominated by the import reduction. Small rounding differences can arise because published headline figures use fewer decimal places than the underlying trade series.
Quick Trade Data Table
Indicator | July–September 2026 | July–September 2025 | Year-on-year change
Exports to seven partners | $864.878m | $779.425m | +10.96%
Imports from seven partners | $3.717bn | $4.648bn | −20.02%
Regional trade deficit | About $2.85bn | About $3.87bn | −26.35%
Source: State Bank of Pakistan country-wise data, as compiled and reported by Dawn, October 25, 2026. Values are rounded as published.
Why Did the Regional Trade Gap Narrow?
The main explanation is the decline in the value of imports from the seven trading partners. Pakistan purchases substantial petroleum, petroleum products, liquefied natural gas and other inputs from Middle Eastern suppliers. When those import payments fall, the measured merchandise deficit with the region can narrow quickly even if Pakistan’s export performance improves only gradually.
Dawn reported particularly large reductions in import payments to Kuwait and Qatar: 97.46% and 72.51%, respectively, from a year earlier. The two countries together were said to account for about $947.923 million of the gross reduction in import payments, although increases elsewhere, particularly Oman, partly offset the drop.
It would be misleading to assume that falling import values reflect only an efficiency gain. Trade-value changes can arise from volumes, prices, shipment timing, sourcing decisions and supply disruptions. The country-wise figures alone do not establish how much of each change came from those individual factors.
Exports Rise Nearly 11%, Led by the UAE
Pakistan’s exports to the seven-country group increased 10.96% to $864.878 million during the quarter. The United Arab Emirates accounted for approximately 66.21% of the group’s export receipts, according to the State Bank figures cited by Dawn. Saudi Arabia accounted for another 19.45%, leaving a combined 14.34% share for the remaining five partners.
The concentration illustrates why changing demand in the UAE and Saudi markets can strongly influence Pakistan’s regional export performance. However, an export share is a proportion of receipts, not a growth rate. The UAE’s 66.21% share does not mean Pakistani exports to the UAE grew by that percentage. Dawn reported an increase of 16.35% in exports to the UAE and 4.92% to Saudi Arabia from the comparable period.
To evaluate durable export progress, policymakers and businesses would need more detail on product composition, customer relationships and shipment volumes, not merely a positive quarterly percentage.
UAE Trade: Higher Exports and Lower Imports
The UAE remained Pakistan’s most important export destination within the seven-country group. Export receipts rose 16.35% during July–September, with gains reported in trade involving Abu Dhabi, Ajman and Fujairah. Imports from the UAE fell 6.15%, with Dawn linking the movement mainly to smaller petroleum and commodity inflows.
The UAE functions as a major regional commercial and logistics hub, so shifts in trade values may reflect direct demand, re-export routes, energy trade or changing sourcing arrangements. Those possibilities should not be confused with individually verified explanations for every shipment. A country-wise trade balance can improve when exports rise and imports decline together, but the total does not reveal whether all exporting sectors experienced the same conditions.
For Pakistani exporters, maintaining access to the UAE market may remain particularly important because of the region’s concentration of sales. Product-level trade data would help identify which sectors contributed most to the increase.
Saudi Arabia: Exports Grow as Imports Decline
Exports to Saudi Arabia rose by 4.92% compared with July–September a year earlier, according to Dawn’s report. Imports from the kingdom decreased 18.52%, with energy purchases an important component of the relationship.
These movements imply a narrower merchandise imbalance with Saudi Arabia, although the report does not provide a detailed product-by-product breakdown explaining every change. The kingdom remains a major economic partner for Pakistan through trade, energy links and wider financial and employment relationships. Nevertheless, workers’ remittances and investment announcements should not be combined with merchandise exports when discussing this particular trade deficit.
Trade statistics measure the value of goods crossing the relevant reporting categories. They are distinct from services, remittances and financial flows, which appear in other parts of the external accounts.
Qatar and Kuwait: Steep Falls in Import Payments
The largest year-on-year percentage reductions appeared in imports from Kuwait and Qatar. Kuwait’s reported import payments plunged 97.46%, while those from Qatar were down 72.51%. Exports to Kuwait declined 2.24%, and those to Qatar fell 22.79%.
The contrast shows why a narrower bilateral deficit does not automatically indicate stronger exports. In both cases, reported exports weakened, yet the import collapse was much larger. Trade disruptions, energy purchasing patterns and shipment timing can materially affect small quarterly comparisons, particularly when trade is dominated by a few major products.
The sharp Qatar and Kuwait import declines require careful interpretation. Without complete contract-level information, the figures alone cannot prove that all purchases stopped permanently, that a particular contract was cancelled or that one type of energy import was fully replaced. They represent trade values recorded for the measured period.
Oman, Bahrain and Jordan Show Mixed Trends
Not every country followed the same pattern. Imports from Oman rose 97.40%, while exports to Oman increased 10.73%. This substantial import increase partly offset declines from other suppliers, underlining how aggregate regional figures can conceal divergent bilateral developments.
Exports to Bahrain contracted 23.07%, and imports from Bahrain declined 17.31%. Meanwhile, exports to Jordan increased 4.70%, while imports decreased 29.27%. The seven-country aggregate therefore contains both expanding and contracting trade relationships.
These differences matter for businesses exploring new markets. A favourable regional headline cannot substitute for analysing demand, tariffs, logistics, pricing and the specific product categories relevant to a particular destination.
How Regional Conflict Has Affected Trade
Dawn’s October 25 coverage connected the shifts in trade to disruptions stemming from the Middle East conflict since earlier in 2026. Energy transportation routes, shipping availability and trade financing can all be sensitive to geopolitical uncertainty, and interruptions may influence whether shipments are delayed, redirected or purchased from alternative suppliers.
However, the data do not quantify exactly how much of the 26.35% narrowing is attributable to conflict rather than price movements or commercial decisions. A sound economic analysis separates the observed trade outcome from possible contributing causes. Changes in oil prices, import quantities, inventory adjustments and payment schedules may operate simultaneously.
For Pakistan, the sensitivity is particularly important because imported energy supports power generation, transport and industrial production. Short-term reductions in energy imports can lower the recorded trade bill, but reduced supply or higher domestic costs may create other economic challenges.
Why the Smaller Gulf Deficit Is Not the Same as a Smaller National Deficit
Pakistan’s national merchandise trade includes imports and exports with countries across the world, not only this seven-country group. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics data for July–September 2026 show national exports of approximately $8.445 billion, up 11.13%, while other PBS-based reporting places imports at about $19.21 billion, producing a national merchandise trade deficit of approximately $10.77 billion.
That overall deficit was reported to be about 14.87% wider than the year-earlier national figure. The Gulf-partner shortfall could therefore shrink even as the national gap expands, because trade with other countries or sectors moves differently. Neither statistic contradicts the other: they describe distinct geographic scopes.
This is also different from the current-account balance, which additionally incorporates services, primary income and secondary income such as remittances. A reduction in the merchandise trade deficit with one region does not by itself imply an improvement in Pakistan’s entire balance of payments.
What Do These Numbers Mean for the Pakistani Rupee?
A lower regional import bill can reduce demand for foreign currency associated with purchases from those trading partners, while larger exports can bring in additional foreign exchange receipts. Both mechanisms are relevant to external trade accounting.
Still, it would be speculative to say that the regional deficit decline has already strengthened the Pakistani rupee by a particular amount. Currency markets respond to numerous variables, including total imports and exports, remittances, investment flows, debt repayments, central-bank decisions and global market conditions. The source figures do not isolate the effect of this seven-country trade balance on the exchange rate.
Readers should therefore view the change as one part of Pakistan’s external-sector position rather than a stand-alone forecast of currency appreciation or lower inflation.
Implications for Importers and Exporters
For businesses importing fuel, industrial inputs or other commodities, changes in the Gulf supply chain can affect procurement planning, inventory management and delivery times. An aggregate decline in imports may indicate lower recorded purchases, but it does not tell each importer whether prices or availability have improved.
Exporters may view the increase in sales to the UAE and Saudi Arabia as a positive signal. However, performance in Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain highlights that demand across regional markets is uneven. Companies evaluating expansion should examine country-specific products, market access and customer demand before drawing conclusions from the headline export rate.
Commercial opportunities should be distinguished from guarantees. Nothing in the quarterly data establishes that a specific Pakistani company will win a contract, that export margins increased or that financing conditions have improved.
Energy Dependence Remains a Long-Term Consideration
The regional trade data again underscore Pakistan’s reliance on imported energy and commodities. Dawn reported that the UAE and Saudi Arabia accounted for a substantial combined share of the country’s energy-related imports from the studied group. Such concentration can magnify exposure to supply disruption and international price volatility.
Greater diversification of energy supplies, improved efficiency and domestic energy development may be relevant policy considerations, but the October statistics do not measure the results of any new policy programme. A sustained reduction in the external trade gap would ideally reflect competitive exports and resilient supply arrangements, rather than interruptions that leave businesses unable to obtain necessary inputs.
Longer-term comparisons will help determine whether the third-quarter change represents a durable trend or a temporary response to exceptional conditions.
How the New Figures Compare With Earlier 2026 Reports
Trade patterns shifted within the fiscal year. Dawn reported in September that the bilateral deficit with the Gulf group had narrowed during July alone, largely due to weaker imports. Its September 27 report, using July–August data, described a 2.61% widening of the regional deficit to around $3.450 billion compared with the year-earlier two-month period.
The October 25 report, covering the full July–September quarter, instead showed a 26.35% contraction. This chronology matters because a one-month, two-month or three-month percentage can convey a different picture, especially where trade flows are irregular. A quarter-to-date update should not be casually compared with a single month.
Any article using these numbers should identify the date range and fiscal year in the headline, charts and accompanying social-media graphics to prevent misleading comparisons.
What Should Policymakers and Businesses Watch Next?
Future trade releases can help show whether the import decline persists and whether export growth broadens beyond the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Monthly country-level data, energy import volumes and international commodity prices would be particularly useful for evaluating the drivers of the regional balance.
Pakistan’s overall trade data, available through PBS, and the Ministry of Commerce’s monthly trade review provide additional context. Monitoring national imports, exports, sector composition and services trade will help establish whether changes with Gulf partners are part of a wider shift in the economy or remain region-specific.
The October 25 report documents the first quarter of FY27. It does not establish that the same rate of improvement will continue throughout the fiscal year.
Conclusion
Pakistan’s trade deficit with seven Gulf and Middle Eastern partners narrowed 26.35% to approximately $2.85 billion in July–September 2026. Exports rose to $864.878 million, while imports fell to $3.717 billion, with especially large declines in payments to Kuwait and Qatar. The UAE remained the largest destination for Pakistani exports within the group, followed by Saudi Arabia.
This represents a meaningful change in the regional merchandise balance, but the interpretation needs care. Lower energy-related imports and conflict-related disruptions are part of the story, and Pakistan’s overall national merchandise deficit widened during the same quarter. The next rounds of official data will help show whether the regional improvement is sustained and whether stronger exports play a greater role.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was Pakistan’s Gulf trade deficit in July–September 2026?
It was approximately $2.85 billion, according to SBP-compiled figures reported by Dawn on October 25, 2026.
By how much did the Gulf trade deficit fall?
The reported deficit narrowed 26.35% from approximately $3.87 billion a year earlier.
How much did Pakistan export to the seven partner countries?
Exports totalled $864.878 million in the first quarter of FY2026–27, up 10.96% year on year.
How much did Pakistan import from the region?
Imports were reported at $3.717 billion, down 20.02% from $4.648 billion in the previous year’s comparable quarter.
Which country bought the largest share of Pakistan’s exports?
The UAE accounted for approximately 66.21% of exports to the seven-country group.
Why did imports from Qatar and Kuwait fall so sharply?
Reported import payments dropped substantially, but the figures alone do not fully explain the mix of energy prices, volumes, timing or disruption behind those changes.
Did Pakistan’s overall trade deficit decline too?
No. Separate nationwide PBS-based data indicated that Pakistan’s overall merchandise trade deficit widened year on year during July–September 2026.
Which countries are covered by the report?
The seven partners are the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain and Jordan; Jordan is not a Gulf Cooperation Council member.
About The Author
