SBP Open Banking Regulations 2026: Pakistan Proposes Secure Bank Data Sharing and Digital Payment Rules

The SBP Open Banking Regulations 2026 could reshape Pakistan’s financial technology industry after the State Bank of Pakistan released a draft framework for public consultation on October 30, 2026. The proposed regulations would allow authorised third-party providers to access specified banking information and initiate eligible business payments through secure interfaces, but only within a system of customer consent and regulatory safeguards. Banks, microfinance banks and certain electronic money institutions would be covered as account-holding institutions under the proposed model. The central bank says the initiative aims to encourage innovation, improve customer choice, strengthen competition and support financing access for small and medium enterprises. It is important to stress that these are draft regulations: a public comment period runs through November 30, and the document does not mean every bank must begin sharing data immediately. This article examines what the proposal says, what it may mean for users and fintech businesses, and which provisions remain subject to change.

SBP Open Banking Regulations 2026: Quick Facts

Regulator: State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

Draft released: Friday, October 30, 2026.

Report updated: November 1, 2026.

Legal status: Draft for public consultation; not yet final regulations.

Feedback deadline: November 30, 2026.

Public comment email: psdpolicy@sbp.org.pk.

Email subject: Feedback on Draft Open Banking Regulations.

Postal submission: Payment Systems Policy & Oversight Department, 4th Floor, SBP Building, I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi.

Covered institution types proposed: Banks, microfinance banks and electronic money institutions where relevant.

Account Holding Institutions (AHIs): Organisations holding customer accounts covered by the proposed access framework.

Third Party Providers (TPPs): Authorised providers of financial-data and payment-initiation services.

Main mechanism: Secure application programming interfaces (APIs).

Core safeguard: Explicit, customer-controlled consent.

Payment use cases: Business-to-business (B2B) and consumer-to-business (C2B).

Proposed additional benefit: Data-assisted credit assessments for SMEs and merchants.

Data location: Storage and processing inside Pakistan, subject to permitted cloud outsourcing exceptions.

Implementation date: Not announced in the official consultation statement.

Official source: SBP announcement, October 30, 2026.

What Are the SBP Open Banking Regulations 2026?

Open banking describes a regulated arrangement in which a financial institution can share selected customer-permitted information with an authorised provider using secure technical connections. The central bank’s October 30 proposal creates a possible framework for implementing that approach more consistently in Pakistan. For example, a customer might eventually allow an approved financial application to retrieve account transaction data to provide a budgeting service or support a credit application. Another application might initiate a business payment after the customer approves the request. The objective is to make useful services possible without requiring customers to surrender login passwords to unrelated applications. However, detailed obligations and permitted activities depend on the final rules, which have not yet been issued.

Why Did SBP Release the Draft Now?

Pakistan has seen sustained growth in digital payments and financial applications, increasing the importance of clear technical standards and customer protections. SBP says the proposal draws on international practices and experience from the first cohort of its Regulatory Sandbox focusing on open banking. A sandbox allows selected firms to test financial innovations under regulatory supervision and helps policymakers identify operational issues before wider deployment. The new draft attempts to translate those lessons into a structured regime for banks and authorised service providers. It is a policy consultation rather than evidence that a particular new service has already been rolled out to all account holders.

How Customer Consent Would Work

Consent is the central condition for the proposed data-sharing framework. The underlying principle is that an authorised provider should not receive a customer’s financial information merely because it has a commercial relationship with a bank or financial technology firm. Instead, the customer would need to approve the relevant access within defined conditions. Reporting on the draft describes provisions concerning the purpose and duration of access, authentication and the ability to withdraw permission. The final experience could vary among banking applications and service providers. At this stage, consumers should understand consent as a proposed protective framework, not an invitation to share passwords with any app claiming to support open banking.

What Type of Financial Information Could Be Shared?

The reported draft contemplates access to account-related information such as balances and transaction histories through secure APIs, subject to permission and applicable conditions. Transaction data can be useful for budgeting tools, financial management software and some lending assessments. It can also reveal sensitive information about an individual’s spending patterns, which is why privacy protections matter. There is no basis to claim every record held by a bank would become freely accessible or publicly searchable. The intended model limits disclosure to authorised providers and approved purposes. Users should ask what information is requested, why it is needed and how long the provider expects to retain it.

What Are Third Party Providers?

Third Party Providers, or TPPs, are businesses or eligible organisations that may offer services using permitted financial data or payment initiation functionality. The draft proposes an authorisation and oversight process rather than allowing any unknown software developer to connect directly to banking accounts. A provider might develop a personal finance tool, merchant payment service or financing assessment product. Its ability to operate would depend on meeting technical, security and regulatory requirements. No complete final list of authorised providers had been published as part of the October 30 announcement. Consumers should not interpret a company’s claim of ‘open banking support’ as proof that SBP has licensed or endorsed it.

What Are Account Holding Institutions?

Account Holding Institutions, or AHIs, are organisations that maintain customer accounts and would be expected to support appropriate consent-based access under the proposed framework. Reporting on the draft includes banks, microfinance banks and electronic money institutions where the rules apply. These institutions would need to use secure technical interfaces and maintain customer protections when responding to authorised requests. The idea is not to remove the financial institution’s role but to create standard ways for eligible external services to interact with it. A precise list of covered firms and any phased transition would depend on the final regulations and subsequent implementation directions.

What Is an API in Open Banking?

An application programming interface, commonly called an API, is a software connection that allows two systems to exchange defined information or requests according to technical rules. In open banking, APIs are intended to replace insecure practices such as giving a third party a personal internet-banking password. The bank can check whether a request comes from an authorised provider and whether the customer has approved the particular activity. APIs are not inherently risk-free, however. They still require robust authentication, monitoring, access controls, testing and incident response. SBP’s draft attempts to create a regulatory structure around those operational responsibilities.

How Could Open Banking Change Digital Payments?

The proposal addresses payment initiation through authorised providers, especially business-to-business and consumer-to-business transactions. In practical terms, approved software may eventually help customers instruct payments to merchants or make transfers associated with business activity. That can reduce friction in certain checkout or accounting workflows if the necessary integrations work reliably. However, a payment service would still need to satisfy consent, authentication and other applicable protections. The draft does not mean any application can remove money from a bank account without authorisation. Nor does it establish that a particular fintech’s new payment product is already available nationwide.

Business-to-Business Payments Explained

B2B payments involve transactions between companies, such as a retailer paying a supplier or a manufacturer settling an invoice. These transfers are often linked to accounting systems, approval workflows and recordkeeping. An open-banking structure might allow eligible business software to initiate a permitted payment while preserving an auditable connection to the underlying bank. The operational benefit could be reduced duplicate data entry and clearer reconciliation. Such advantages remain conditional on implementation and product design. It would be premature to announce universal instant settlements, reduced fees for every business or integration with all enterprise software before approved systems are launched.

Consumer-to-Business Payments Explained

C2B payments occur when an individual pays a business for goods or services. Open banking could create another channel for an authorised provider to initiate a bank-linked payment after the customer approves the transaction. The proposed approach may support merchants that wish to integrate payments into an app or online checkout. The user must still know whom they are paying, the amount involved and the conditions of consent. News reporting on the proposal suggests that some fees may be restricted, but the actual final charging structure must be checked when regulations and provider terms are issued. Consumers should never assume every future service is free.

What Is the Role of Raast?

Raast is Pakistan’s instant payment infrastructure operated within the country’s regulated payment ecosystem. Reporting that reviewed the draft describes proposals involving Raast Payments Pakistan in the broader open-banking service arrangement. Linking new services with established digital payment infrastructure may help standardise transactions and support interoperability. Nevertheless, the central bank’s press release focuses on customer consent, authorised third-party services and secure payment initiation. It does not provide a launch date for every technical integration. A reader should distinguish the existing Raast payment system from the proposed additional open-banking framework, which is still subject to consultation.

Could Open Banking Help Small Businesses Get Loans?

SBP identifies improved credit assessments and expanded SME financing access among the potential benefits. A lender may find transaction records useful in assessing a business that lacks conventional collateral or a long formal credit history. With appropriate permission, data on account activity could help create a clearer picture of revenue and cash flow. However, access to financial records is not equivalent to approval of credit. Banks and other lenders will continue to assess financial risk, documentation, repayment capacity and applicable regulation. The proposal should not be advertised as a guaranteed loan scheme or an offer of interest-free borrowing to every entrepreneur.

How Is This Different From SBP SMEConnect?

SMEConnect is a separate State Bank initiative involving a central digital channel for eligible business-financing applications. Its November 1, 2026, effective date is distinct from the open-banking consultation. Open banking concerns permissions and technical infrastructure for sharing financial information and initiating certain payments through authorised providers. The two initiatives could support related financial inclusion objectives, but they are not the same portal and do not have the same legal status. SMEConnect was directed to begin operating under its separate circular, while the Open Banking Regulations remain a draft under public consultation. Mixing the two stories could mislead applicants about where to apply for a loan.

How Might Fintech Startups Benefit?

Fintech startups often build specialised services such as expense management, merchant accounting, digital payment tools or financing support. A clear open-banking framework could reduce uncertainty about whether and how a startup may obtain customers’ authorised banking information. Standard access methods could also support new product design and competition. At the same time, meeting licensing and cybersecurity requirements may involve significant cost and technical expertise. A company is not guaranteed market access simply because it labels itself a fintech. The final regulatory text, testing arrangements and individual authorisation decisions will determine which services can operate.

Why Data Privacy Is Central to the Proposal

Financial transactions can reveal salaries, business suppliers, family expenses and other sensitive patterns. Sharing that information with an outside provider introduces additional responsibility for limiting collection and protecting data throughout its use. SBP’s draft refers to customer consent, privacy safeguards and security expectations. The reporting also highlights requirements concerning storage and processing within Pakistan, with exceptions for cloud services that comply with the regulator’s outsourcing framework. These measures are proposals and should be examined carefully during consultation. Privacy depends not just on written policies but also on implementation, monitoring and the ability of customers to revoke permission.

Where Would Customer Banking Data Be Stored?

Dawn’s November 1 report says the draft provides that customer data obtained under open banking should be stored and processed in Pakistan unless handling through a cloud provider meets the State Bank’s established outsourcing framework. This is an important qualification: it is not an absolute prohibition on every form of cross-border cloud architecture. The final regulations may define detailed controls and exceptions. Data localisation can affect how providers design infrastructure and choose hosting vendors. It should not be assumed that a Pakistani server location alone guarantees security; access management, encryption, incident response and oversight remain essential.

What Cybersecurity Protections Are Proposed?

The draft framework addresses cybersecurity, fraud prevention, consumer protection and technical security requirements for participating organisations. Reporting by Profit Pakistan Today discusses timelines for providers to inform SBP about incidents, as well as responsibilities concerning data handling. Those are specific proposed obligations, not currently enforced obligations under a final open-banking rule. Security must cover identity checks, authorised access, protection of APIs, transaction monitoring, data retention and recovery procedures. No control can eliminate all digital risks, but a structured framework can clarify expectations and accountability. The public consultation gives businesses and consumer groups an opportunity to assess whether the protections are sufficiently practical and robust.

What Happens After a Customer Withdraws Consent?

A meaningful consent system needs a way to end access when the customer no longer wishes to share information. Reporting on the draft describes proposed retention and deletion controls, with some exceptions when records are required for legal or regulatory purposes. In practice, revoking permission should prevent further unauthorised access under that consent, while previously collected information may be subject to legitimate retention rules. The exact deadlines and technical workflow should be read from the final approved framework, not treated as permanently fixed now. Customers should be able to identify the provider involved and the activity they are authorising.

Will Banks Be Forced to Share Every Customer’s Data?

No responsible description of the proposal should suggest unrestricted mass publication of banking records. The framework is intended to require covered institutions to support authorised data access when the relevant customer gives consent and required safeguards are met. That is different from making every balance or transaction publicly available. Technical obligations imposed on banks and the customer’s decision to approve a particular use are separate parts of the model. Some future services may request access for specific purposes, but customers should read the details and avoid approving unfamiliar applications merely because they claim to be part of a government initiative.

Could Open Banking Make Financial Services Cheaper?

Greater competition and more efficient digital payment processes could improve customer choice and potentially reduce costs for certain services. That is among the policy goals associated with open banking internationally. However, there is no verified November 1 announcement guaranteeing a uniform reduction in bank fees, loan interest or fintech charges across Pakistan. Prices depend on business models, competition and the final rules. Any reported draft provision on fees must be distinguished from actual pricing after launch. Consumers and merchants should evaluate the cost of specific approved products rather than assume the framework will automatically make all financial services free.

What Has the Regulatory Sandbox Contributed?

SBP says the proposed rules were informed by the first cohort of its Regulatory Sandbox focused on open banking. Such testing environments are intended to let participating firms explore innovations under oversight before regulators issue or refine general requirements. They can provide evidence about customer journeys, technical interoperability and operational risks. But success in a sandbox is not the same as a permanent authorisation to offer a product to every banking customer. The draft framework is a broader policy step that follows experimentation. Future reporting should examine which lessons were adopted, what technical requirements changed and whether new providers complete the required authorisation process.

What Does the November 30 Deadline Mean?

The State Bank has invited written feedback by November 30, 2026, from banks, fintech businesses, technology providers, consumer organisations, academics and members of the public. This is a consultation deadline, not the date on which all proposed rules automatically become enforceable. SBP may review submissions, revise provisions or provide later implementation instructions. A final regulation, effective date and transitional period would need separate confirmation. The distinction matters for both consumers and businesses: no one should be told that permission-sharing apps will become compulsory on November 30 just because consultation comments close that day.

How to Submit Feedback to SBP

Interested parties can send comments to psdpolicy@sbp.org.pk with the subject line ‘Feedback on Draft Open Banking Regulations’, according to the Associated Press of Pakistan. Written submissions may also be addressed to the Payment Systems Policy & Oversight Department, 4th Floor, SBP Building, I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi. The deadline is November 30, 2026. Comments are more useful when they identify a specific provision, explain the potential impact and suggest a practical alternative. Anyone planning to submit should first read the draft on the official State Bank website to ensure they are responding to its actual wording. Submitting feedback is not an application for an individual banking product.

What Should Ordinary Bank Customers Do Now?

There is no need to download an unfamiliar app or share banking credentials because of the draft announcement. Customers can continue using their existing bank services and follow official updates. If a third-party application later requests access, verify that it is legitimate and authorised, understand the requested data and duration, and make sure payment amounts are clear before approving. Never give passwords, PINs or one-time authentication codes to someone who calls or messages claiming to be an open-banking representative. The public consultation does not create a new emergency account-verification requirement. Fraudsters sometimes exploit regulatory news, so direct official channels are preferable to forwarded social posts.

What Should Banks and Fintech Companies Prepare For?

Financial institutions may wish to study the proposed definitions, consent flows, API security expectations, incident reporting and customer support responsibilities. Technology firms can assess whether their intended products fit the proposed categories and what authorisation or testing would require. Because the document is still a draft, preparations should be treated as planning rather than proof that a final obligation exists. Businesses may submit technical comments about interoperability, implementation schedules and customer protection. Collaboration between banks and providers will matter if a nationwide open-banking ecosystem is introduced. The eventual scope and pace will depend on SBP’s final decisions.

What Are the Main Implementation Challenges?

The proposed system will need to balance innovation with privacy, technical reliability and clear consumer communication. Banks may have different legacy systems, while fintech providers vary in security resources. Standard APIs, consistent consent screens and effective supervision can reduce some differences, but implementation remains complex. A failure in one provider could affect customers’ confidence more broadly, making incident handling important. These are foreseeable industry challenges, not allegations that a particular Pakistani institution has suffered a breach. Regulators and participants will need to make choices about testing, audits, dispute resolution, fraud monitoring and data retention before services become widespread.

Could the Framework Improve Financial Inclusion?

The State Bank expects better access to digital finance and more tailored financial products to be among the possible results. In theory, consenting customers could use their existing banking history with approved providers instead of repeatedly submitting the same financial information. That may help merchants or businesses with limited traditional credit documentation. However, digital exclusion can still occur among people without smartphones, stable internet or strong digital literacy. A responsible rollout would need understandable consent processes, accessible support and safeguards against inappropriate use of financial data. Financial inclusion should be measured by actual consumer outcomes after implementation, not assumed from regulatory ambition alone.

How Will Pakistan Compare With Global Open Banking Models?

Other markets have introduced open-banking systems with different models for API access, customer consent, provider licensing and payment initiation. Pakistan’s draft explicitly refers to international best practice and local sandbox testing. That does not mean the regulatory systems are identical or that every service available abroad will immediately operate in Pakistan. Rules governing privacy, domestic data storage and the responsibilities of financial institutions may differ. For local users, the key question is whether the final Pakistani model produces practical benefits while giving customers meaningful control over their information. International comparisons are useful context, but local regulatory text remains the authoritative guide.

What Would Make the Framework Successful?

Successful open banking would require secure and reliable technical interfaces, clear customer consent, responsive dispute handling and meaningful oversight of authorised firms. Financial products also need to deliver real value rather than merely replicate existing processes with extra steps. For merchants, useful indicators could include quicker reconciliation, dependable payment initiation and more transparent credit applications. For consumers, privacy and the ability to manage permissions are central. Policymakers will need evidence about adoption, service reliability and complaints. A draft is an opportunity to design those safeguards; success cannot be declared before the framework is finalised and used in real operating conditions.

What Happens After Public Consultation?

Once the November 30 deadline passes, SBP may review suggestions from industry, academia and the public, and potentially revise its proposals. Any decision to approve the final regulations would need an official publication and, where relevant, commencement or transition instructions. The October 30 announcement does not establish a guaranteed finalisation date or a fixed nationwide start. Subsequent Mukhbir updates should therefore look for the exact final text, licence or authorisation procedures, technical implementation requirements and public guidance on consent. Until those are available, the headline should continue to say ‘draft’ or ‘proposed’, never ‘new mandatory rules now in force’.

Conclusion

The SBP Open Banking Regulations 2026 mark an important consultation stage in Pakistan’s digital finance strategy. Released on October 30, the proposed framework would support customer-authorised sharing of banking information and eligible payment initiation through regulated third-party providers. It seeks to encourage innovation, improve merchant and SME services and establish protections for privacy, security and consumer rights. The public can submit comments until November 30, 2026. However, no final nationwide implementation date has been announced, and the proposal does not require customers to surrender banking data without consent. Its eventual impact will depend on the final rules and how participating institutions put them into practice.

Frequently Asked Questions

About The Author